I entered education as a high school teacher in South Carolina in the 1984-1985 academic year, the first year of a significant teacher pay raise and a pivotal ground zero in the state’s accountability era established in late 1970s legislation.
Over about four decades, SC has revised or changed educational standards six or seven times and implemented about the same number of different state and national tests.
And what hath this curse of testing and standards wrought for SC?
South Carolina students bomb the ACT, falling behind Mississippi, announces an article by Paul Bowers explaining:
South Carolina’s graduating class of 2018 came close to dead-last in the nation on the ACT college readiness test, painting a grim picture of a state that has languished near the bottom of education rankings for decades.
This year’s graduates placed 50th among the states and Washington, D.C., on the ACT, according to composite scores based on the test’s English, Reading, Math and Science sections.
Only Nevada’s students did worse.
The chicken-little politics of accountability has been fulfilled in ways that assure politicians, the public, and the media will declare schools, teachers, and students a failure. Yet again, and again, ad nauseam.
Let’s try something different here, ways to interpret better this data from the ACT.
The first key point about these scores is that SC is experiencing bureaucratic insanity—doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results.
The problem with eduction in SC has little to do with test scores, which overwhelmingly reflect what the problem is: Poverty and inequities grounded in that poverty as well as racism.
In fact, this response to the article exposes how misguided the entire process is:
Why can’t we look at the top 5 States and implement the same curriculum?? Use the same books—teacher materials for K-12?? It doesn’t seem like a difficult solution! https://t.co/htYKGnXBZL
— Lisa Register (@LisaIOP) October 18, 2018
While political and popular gazes remain fixed on test scores and standards (curriculum), we have failed to acknowledge that the quality—or even presence—of standards (and the concurrent curriculum) have no clear impact on measurable student outcomes.
The accountability era has not worked in SC, and it never will.
Ever-new standards and ever-new tests are simply rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
Here, then, are a couple more ways we can and should respond to the ACT scores.
Why is SC requiring all students to take a test to measure college readiness when a much smaller percentage of those students plan to enter college? And why this rush to prepare all students for college when it remains unaffordable for many, if not most, SC residents?
What assures that test scores on the ACT are mostly about teaching and learning, instead of poverty, racism, or even student effort (in other words, what assurance do we have that students have taken this test seriously)?
And finally, a significant failure of the chicken-little politics of test scores in SC is the misguided urge to rank (see the problems here).
What if we consider that SC is in the bottom quartile of states by poverty, and then, what if we concede that standardized tests are at least 60% and possibly over 80% linked to out-of-school factors (not any quality of schools, standards, or teaching) such as poverty and affluence? SC should be near or at the bottom of any rankings because of the state’s abysmal record of class and rank inequity as well as a very long history of underfunding and ignoring public education—especially in the most vulnerable communities.
This most recent sky-is-falling media report is our own hellish Groundhog Day experience; this article has been written dozens of times over the past four decades, and it can be recycled dozens of more times in the future.
Unlike the befuddled Phil (Bill Murray) in the movie, we actually can bring this nightmare to a stop.
If we have the political and public will, the media will be able to give this dark fairy tale a rest.